Why ProfileScribe keeps fact extraction separate from published claims
Abstracts
Abstracts
One design choice behind ProfileScribe: the crawler agent that reads approved public links never writes directly to a profile. It normalizes what it finds into timestamped facts first, and only then does that evidence move into professional memory for review.
The separation matters more than it sounds. Profiles are easy to overstate by accident, especially when updates are automated. Keeping extraction and claims as distinct steps, with a review queue in between, means a post can be traced back to something that was actually fetched and verified rather than inferred.
It's a small architectural decision, but it's the one that makes automated profile updates worth trusting.