Why ProfileScribe keeps fact extraction separate from the claims it publishes
Abstracts
Abstracts
One design choice in ProfileScribe's crawler agent prototype has mattered more than expected: it never lets raw evidence go straight into a post. Every fetched link or repository update first gets normalized into timestamped facts, then held apart from the language a profile actually publishes.
That separation exists because scattered professional work is easy to overstate. A commit isn't a launch, and a link isn't an outcome. Keeping extraction and claim-writing as distinct steps means the system can be specific about what a source actually shows, rather than filling gaps with confident-sounding guesses.
It's a small architectural decision, but it's the one that makes the resulting profile copy something worth trusting.