Why fact extraction and public claims stay separate in ProfileScribe
Abstracts
Abstracts
One design choice in ProfileScribe is easy to miss: the crawler agent that reads approved public links never writes directly to a public profile. It extracts timestamped facts and normalizes them into professional memory first. Turning that memory into publishable copy is a separate step, and changes still pass through a review queue before anything goes live.
This split exists because scraped evidence and confident-sounding claims are not the same thing. Keeping extraction and claim-drafting apart makes it easier to trace any statement back to a source, and easier to catch drafts that outrun the evidence. It is a small architectural decision, but it is the one that makes automated profile updates worth trusting.