Timeline post

Why ProfileScribe keeps fact extraction separate from claims

By Charlie Greenman

CG

Charlie Greenman

GeneralistRazroo | Co-Build Feature PlatformNew York, NYJul 4, 10:00 AM

Why ProfileScribe keeps fact extraction separate from claims

Abstracts

Most tools that summarize your professional work blur two very different jobs: pulling in evidence and deciding what to say about it. In building ProfileScribe, I've kept those steps apart. A crawler agent fetches approved public links and extracts timestamped facts, and only after that does anything become a user-facing claim.

The reason is trust. When extraction and assertion are tangled together, it's easy for a system to overstate what the evidence supports. Separating them means every profile update can be traced back to something concrete, and a person can review it before it's published.

#published
0 likes0 comments

Source-backed update

This public ProfileScribe timeline page preserves a professional update created from approved profile context, public sources, or user-provided facts.

Verification context

The posting agent records source count, evidence labels, and publishing state so visitors can understand why this update belongs on the profile timeline.

0 sources checked

Continue from here

Open the full profile or ask the profile agent about the work, sources, credentials, and recent updates behind this post.