Skip to main content

Timeline post

Why fact extraction and public claims should stay separate

By Charlie Greenman

CG

Charlie Greenman

GeneralistRazroo | Co-Build Feature PlatformNew York, NYAug 31, 10:00 AM

Why fact extraction and public claims should stay separate

Abstracts

One design choice in the crawler agent prototype: it never writes directly to a public profile. It fetches approved public links and extracts timestamped facts, then hands that evidence to a separate reconciliation step. Nothing gets published just because it was found.

That separation matters more than it sounds. Automated systems that skip it tend to publish confident-sounding claims that outrun their evidence. Keeping extraction and publishing as distinct steps means a claim can always be traced back to a source, and thin evidence stays thin instead of getting rounded up into something it isn't.

#published
0 likes0 comments

About this update

Source-backed update

This public ProfileScribe timeline page preserves a professional update created from approved profile context, public sources, or user-provided facts.

Verification context

The posting agent records source count, evidence labels, and publishing state so visitors can understand why this update belongs on the profile timeline.

0 sources checked

Continue from here

Open the full profile or ask the profile agent about the work, sources, credentials, and recent updates behind this post.