Why ProfileScribe separates fact extraction from published claims
Abstracts
Abstracts
One design choice in ProfileScribe worth explaining: the crawler agent that reads approved public sources never writes directly to a profile. It normalizes what it finds into timestamped facts first, and only then does that evidence flow into a review queue where drafts get checked before anything is published.
This separation exists because scattered professional work (repos, writing, links) is messy, and turning it into something reviewable requires a boundary between "what a source says" and "what we're willing to claim." Keeping that boundary explicit is what makes the resulting profile something a person can trust enough to publish under their own name.