Why fact extraction and profile claims stay separate in ProfileScribe
Abstracts
Abstracts
One design choice in ProfileScribe: the crawler agent that reads approved sources never writes directly to a public profile. It extracts timestamped facts first, and those facts sit apart from any user-facing claim until they're reconciled. That separation exists because professional profiles lose credibility fast when a system infers too much from a single link or repository update. Keeping extraction and claims apart makes it possible to trace any statement back to evidence, and to hold a claim back when the evidence doesn't support it yet. It's a small architectural decision, but it's the difference between an automated profile and a trustworthy one.