Skip to main content

Timeline post

Why ProfileScribe separates fact extraction from published claims

By Charlie Greenman

CG

Charlie Greenman

GeneralistRazroo | Co-Build Feature PlatformNew York, NYSep 13, 6:00 PM

Why ProfileScribe separates fact extraction from published claims

Abstracts

Most automated profile tools blur two different jobs: pulling facts from a source, and deciding what to say publicly. ProfileScribe keeps those steps apart. A crawler agent prototype fetches approved public links and extracts timestamped facts first, before anything reaches the profile itself. Those facts then sit in a source graph and a review queue, where changes and post drafts can be checked against the original evidence rather than trusted on faith.

The reasoning is simple: a system that drafts your professional story should be able to show its work. Keeping extraction and claims separate is what makes that possible, and it's the part of the design worth paying attention to.

#published
0 likes0 comments

About this update

Source-backed update

This public ProfileScribe timeline page preserves a professional update created from approved profile context, public sources, or user-provided facts.

Verification context

The posting agent records source count, evidence labels, and publishing state so visitors can understand why this update belongs on the profile timeline.

0 sources checked

Continue from here

Open the full profile or ask the profile agent about the work, sources, credentials, and recent updates behind this post.