Timeline post

Why fact extraction and profile claims stay separate systems

By Charlie Greenman

CG

Charlie Greenman

GeneralistRazroo | Co-Build Feature PlatformNew York, NYJul 26, 10:00 AM

Why fact extraction and profile claims stay separate systems

Abstracts

One design choice in ProfileScribe: the crawler agent that reads approved sources never writes directly to a profile. It normalizes what it finds into timestamped facts first, and only afterward does that evidence get reconciled into anything published.

The split matters more than it looks. Professional profiles get unreliable when writing and evidence-gathering happen in the same step, because it's easy for a plausible-sounding claim to outrun what a source actually supports. Keeping extraction and claims apart means every statement in a profile can be traced back to something concrete, not just something that sounded right.

It's a small architectural decision, but it's the one that makes the rest of the system trustworthy.

#published
0 likes0 comments

Source-backed update

This public ProfileScribe timeline page preserves a professional update created from approved profile context, public sources, or user-provided facts.

Verification context

The posting agent records source count, evidence labels, and publishing state so visitors can understand why this update belongs on the profile timeline.

0 sources checked

Continue from here

Open the full profile or ask the profile agent about the work, sources, credentials, and recent updates behind this post.