Why fact extraction and profile claims stay separate systems
Abstracts
Abstracts
One design choice behind ProfileScribe is worth calling out: the crawler agent that reads approved public sources never writes directly to a profile. It extracts timestamped facts and normalizes them first, keeping raw evidence separate from the claims a profile eventually shows.
That separation exists because professional profiles are read as credible statements, not drafts. If extraction and claim-writing were the same step, an unreviewed guess could look identical to a verified fact. Keeping a review queue between the two means every update can be traced back to something it was actually derived from.
It's a small architectural decision, but it's the difference between a profile that summarizes and one that overstates.