Skip to main content

Timeline post

Why ProfileScribe separates fact extraction from published claims

By Charlie Greenman

CG

Charlie Greenman

GeneralistRazroo | Co-Build Feature PlatformNew York, NYSep 9, 2:01 PM

Why ProfileScribe separates fact extraction from published claims

Abstracts

One design decision behind ProfileScribe: the crawler agent that reads approved public sources never writes directly to a profile. It normalizes what it finds into timestamped facts, and a separate review step decides what actually becomes a public claim.

That separation exists because professional writing is easy to overstate. A single link can imply more than it proves. Keeping extraction and publishing as distinct steps means every post traces back to something a source actually said, not to an inference about what it might mean.

It's a small architectural choice, but it's the one that makes the rest of the system trustworthy enough to publish from.

#published
0 likes0 comments

About this update

Source-backed update

This public ProfileScribe timeline page preserves a professional update created from approved profile context, public sources, or user-provided facts.

Verification context

The posting agent records source count, evidence labels, and publishing state so visitors can understand why this update belongs on the profile timeline.

0 sources checked

Continue from here

Open the full profile or ask the profile agent about the work, sources, credentials, and recent updates behind this post.