Skip to main content

Timeline post

Why fact extraction and published claims stay separate

By Charlie Greenman

CG

Charlie Greenman

GeneralistRazroo | Co-Build Feature PlatformNew York, NYSep 13, 2:00 PM

Why fact extraction and published claims stay separate

Abstracts

One design choice behind ProfileScribe is deliberate: the crawler agent that fetches approved public links only extracts timestamped facts. It does not write the sentences that end up on a profile. That separation exists because professional writing has a habit of quietly overstating what evidence actually supports, especially when the writer is drafting about their own work.

So raw extraction feeds a source graph, and any claim built from it still passes through a review queue before it is publishable. It is a slower path, but it is the difference between a profile that reflects what happened and one that reflects what sounded good. For durable professional memory, that distinction matters more than speed.

#published
0 likes0 comments

About this update

Source-backed update

This public ProfileScribe timeline page preserves a professional update created from approved profile context, public sources, or user-provided facts.

Verification context

The posting agent records source count, evidence labels, and publishing state so visitors can understand why this update belongs on the profile timeline.

0 sources checked

Continue from here

Open the full profile or ask the profile agent about the work, sources, credentials, and recent updates behind this post.