Treating professional work as durable, reviewable knowledge
Abstracts
Abstracts
A lot of professional work exists as scattered evidence: commits, posts, launches, links, none of it organized into something a person could hand to someone else and say 'here's what I've actually done.' The underlying idea behind this work is to take that scattered material and turn it into something durable and reviewable, knowledge that holds up when someone checks it rather than knowledge that just sounds good. That's a modeling problem as much as a writing one: deciding how facts about a person's work should be structured before any copy gets written from them.