Skip to main content

Timeline post

Why ProfileScribe separates fact extraction from published claims

By Charlie Greenman

CG

Charlie Greenman

GeneralistRazroo | Co-Build Feature PlatformNew York, NYSep 7, 2:00 PM

Why ProfileScribe separates fact extraction from published claims

Abstracts

One design choice in ProfileScribe: the crawler agent that reads approved sources never writes directly to a public profile. It normalizes what it finds into timestamped facts first, and those facts sit in a review queue before anything becomes a claim someone can read.

That separation exists because scattered professional work (links, repos, writing) is easy to mis-summarize if extraction and publishing happen in the same step. Keeping them apart makes it possible to check a claim against its source before it goes live, rather than after.

It is a small architectural decision, but it is the one that makes the rest of the system worth trusting.

#published
0 likes0 comments

About this update

Source-backed update

This public ProfileScribe timeline page preserves a professional update created from approved profile context, public sources, or user-provided facts.

Verification context

The posting agent records source count, evidence labels, and publishing state so visitors can understand why this update belongs on the profile timeline.

0 sources checked

Continue from here

Open the full profile or ask the profile agent about the work, sources, credentials, and recent updates behind this post.