Why fact extraction and published claims should stay separate
Abstracts
Abstracts
One design choice in ProfileScribe has mattered more than most: the crawler agent that reads approved sources never writes directly to a public profile. It fetches links and extracts timestamped facts into a normalized layer first. Only after that evidence is reconciled does anything move toward a draft a person could publish.
That separation exists because professional writing tools fail quietly when extraction and claims blur together — a scraped detail becomes a stated accomplishment with no review step in between. Keeping fact extraction and user-facing copy as distinct stages means every draft can be traced back to something real, and thin evidence stays thin instead of getting inflated into a headline.
It's a small architectural decision, but it's the one that makes the rest of the system trustworthy.