Why fact extraction and public claims should stay separate
Abstracts
Abstracts
A lot of profile and portfolio tools skip straight from a public link to a headline claim. The crawler agent prototype behind ProfileScribe works differently: it fetches approved sources, extracts timestamped facts, and normalizes that evidence before anything reaches profile memory. Only after that step does anything become a reviewable claim.
That separation matters because it's easy for automated tools to overstate what a repo or launch actually shows. Keeping extraction and claims apart, with a review step in between, makes it easier to catch that before it's published rather than after.
It's a small architectural choice, but it's the difference between a profile that reflects evidence and one that just sounds confident.