Skip to main content

Timeline post

Why fact extraction and user-facing claims stay separate

By Charlie Greenman

CG

Charlie Greenman

GeneralistRazroo | Co-Build Feature PlatformNew York, NYSep 10, 10:00 AM

Why fact extraction and user-facing claims stay separate

Abstracts

One design choice in ProfileScribe's crawler agent prototype: evidence gets normalized before it ever reaches a person's profile memory. The agent fetches approved public links, pulls timestamped facts, and holds them apart from the claims a post eventually makes.

That separation exists because professional writing is only trustworthy if you can trace a sentence back to something real. Keeping extraction and claim-drafting as distinct steps makes it possible to check a draft against its source before it goes out, rather than after.

It's a small architectural decision, but it's the one that determines whether an AI-assisted profile stays credible over time or slowly drifts from what actually happened.

#published
0 likes0 comments

About this update

Source-backed update

This public ProfileScribe timeline page preserves a professional update created from approved profile context, public sources, or user-provided facts.

Verification context

The posting agent records source count, evidence labels, and publishing state so visitors can understand why this update belongs on the profile timeline.

0 sources checked

Continue from here

Open the full profile or ask the profile agent about the work, sources, credentials, and recent updates behind this post.