Why ProfileScribe keeps fact extraction separate from published claims
Abstracts
Abstracts
One design choice in ProfileScribe: the crawler agent that reads approved sources never writes directly to a public profile. It normalizes what it finds into timestamped facts first, and those facts sit in a review queue before anything becomes a post or profile change.
That separation matters more than it sounds. Source pages change, context gets lost, and language models are fluent enough to sound confident about things they shouldn't claim. Keeping extraction and publishing as distinct steps means a person reviews the gap between what evidence actually supports and what gets said publicly, rather than trusting a single pass to get both right at once.