Why fact extraction and published claims stay separate in ProfileScribe
Abstracts
Abstracts
One design choice in ProfileScribe's crawler agent prototype: it keeps fact extraction separate from the claims that eventually get published. The agent fetches approved public links, pulls timestamped facts, and normalizes that evidence before it ever reaches profile memory. Only after that step does anything become a candidate for a post or profile change, and it still passes through a review queue.
The reasoning is simple. Profiles that summarize a career are only useful if the underlying claims hold up. Separating what a source actually says from what gets written about it is a small architectural decision, but it's the difference between a profile that describes work accurately and one that drifts from it over time.